Tag Archives: GI Bill

Personal Attacks

Barack Obama goes after John McCain on the GI Bill of Rights:

I respect sen. John McCain’s service to our country. He is one of those heroes of which I speak. But I can’t understand why he would line up behind the President in his opposition to this GI bill.

I can’t believe why he believes it is too generous to our veterans. I could not disagree with him and the President more on this issue. There are many issues that lend themselves to partisan posturing but giving our veterans the chance to go to college should not be one of them.

Its a good statement. Short, to the point, hitting McCain hard in an area where he is vulnerable. Evidently, McCain is a little bit peeved about being questioned about this, and he hits back with a long, rambling statement:

“It is typical, but no less offensive that Senator Obama uses the Senate floor to take cheap shots at an opponent and easy advantage of an issue he has less than zero understanding of. Let me say first in response to Senator Obama, running for President is different than serving as President. The office comes with responsibilities so serious that the occupant can’t always take the politically easy route without hurting the country he is sworn to defend. Unlike Senator Obama, my admiration, respect and deep gratitude for America’s veterans is something more than a convenient campaign pledge. I think I have earned the right to make that claim.

“When I was five years old, a car pulled up in front of our house in New London, Connecticut, and a Navy officer rolled down the window, and shouted at my father that the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor. My father immediately left for the submarine base where he was stationed. I rarely saw him again for four years. My grandfather, who commanded the fast carrier task force under Admiral Halsey, came home from the war exhausted from the burdens he had borne, and died the next day. I grew up in the Navy; served for twenty-two years as a naval officer; and, like Senator Webb, personally experienced the terrible costs war imposes on the veteran. The friendships I formed in war remain among the closest relationships in my life. The Navy is still the world I know best and love most. In Vietnam, where I formed the closest friendships of my life, some of those friends never came home to the country they loved so well.

“But I am running for the office of Commander-in-Chief. That is the highest privilege in this country, and it imposes the greatest responsibilities. It would be easier politically for me to have joined Senator Webb in offering his legislation. More importantly, I feel just as he does, that we owe veterans the respect and generosity of a great nation because no matter how generously we show our gratitude it will never compensate them fully for all the sacrifices they have borne on our behalf.

“Senators Graham, Burr and I have offered legislation that would provide veterans with a substantial increase in educational benefits. The bill we have sponsored would increase monthly education benefits to $1500; eliminate the $1200 enrollment fee; and offer a $1000 annually for books and supplies. Importantly, we would allow veterans to transfer those benefits to their spouses or dependent children or use a part of them to pay down existing student loans. We also increase benefits to the Guard and Reserve, and even more generously to those who serve in the Selected Reserve.

“I know that my friend and fellow veteran, Senator Jim Webb, an honorable man who takes his responsibility to veterans very seriously, has offered legislation with very generous benefits. I respect and admire his position, and I would never suggest that he has anything other than the best of intentions to honor the service of deserving veterans. Both Senator Webb and I are united in our deep appreciation for the men and women who risk their lives so that the rest of us may be secure in our freedom. And I take a backseat to no one in my affection, respect and devotion to veterans. And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did.

“The most important difference between our two approaches is that Senator Webb offers veterans who served one enlistment the same benefits as those offered veterans who have re-enlisted several times. Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran’s length of service. I think it is important to do that because, otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment. At a time when the United States military is fighting in two wars, and as we finally are beginning the long overdue and very urgent necessity of increasing the size of the Army and Marine Corps, one study estimates that Senator Webb’s bill will reduce retention rates by 16%.

“Most worrying to me, is that by hurting retention we will reduce the numbers of men and women who we train to become the backbone of all the services, the noncommissioned officer. In my life, I have learned more from noncommissioned officers I have known and served with than anyone else outside my family. And in combat, no one is more important to their soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen, and to the officers who command them, than the sergeant and petty officer. They are very hard to replace. Encouraging people not to choose to become noncommissioned officers would hurt the military and our country very badly. As I said, the office of President, which I am seeking, is a great honor, indeed, but it imposes serious responsibilities. How faithfully the President discharges those responsibilities will determine whether he or she deserves the honor. I can only tell you I intend to deserve the honor if I am fo rtunate to receive it, even if it means I must take politically unpopular positions at times and disagree with people for whom I have the highest respect and affection.

“Perhaps, if Senator Obama would take the time and trouble to understand this issue he would learn to debate an honest disagreement respectfully. But, as he always does, he prefers impugning the motives of his opponent, and exploiting a thoughtful difference of opinion to advance his own ambitions. If that is how he would behave as President, the country would regret his election.”

There is a lot in there. McCain is clearly trying to use his personal history to vaccinate himself against attacks on his record helping veterans. I get that. But McCain goes beyond that here. He goes from saying “I served, I know what this is about, trust my experience,” which is a legitimate and useful political argument to make, to a low and personal attack on Obama when he says, “And I will not accept from Senator Obama, who did not feel it was his responsibility to serve our country in uniform, any lectures on my regard for those who did.” Essentially what McCain is saying here is that only veterans can weigh in on Veterans issues. Never mind that Obama isn’t a johnny-come-lately when it comes to Veterans Issues. He’s worked with Senators like Kit Bond, Barbara Boxer and Claire McCaskill on veterans legislation, before he started running for president. Yet McCain goes after him shamelessly and tries to use the fact that he served as a shield.

McCain even invokes his grandfather going to fight in World War II, grafting it to a paragraph about how he served in Vietnam. He’s trying to tie to to his slam on Obama for not serving. Yet Obama’s grandfather served in World War II, just like McCain’s. I don’t know why this is even relevant, if not to try to imply that Obama and his family, who everyone knows is part foreign, haven’t served their country.

Look, if McCain wants to stand and argue the policy differences between his bill and Webb’s, he can do that. If he wants to argue that veterans shouldn’t get full benefits until they’ve been in the service for 12 years, thats a legitimate policy difference. If he thinks that the giving veterans full benefits after three years will lead to too many people leaving the military, despite the fact that these days, in three years, they’ve already likely been deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan twice, he can make that case. But that isn’t what McCain’s goal is. McCain wants to go after Obama because he didn’t choose to serve in uniform. He chose to serve the community by working on the South Side of Chicago instead.

The Obama campaign gets this; “It’s disappointing that Senator McCain and his campaign used this issue to launch yet another lengthy personal, political attack instead of debating an honest policy difference,” they said. Its a pity that McCain’s either doesn’t, or doesn’t care.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics

Jim Webb Has John McCain Over a Barrell

This is a pretty damn effective ad against John McCain, in my view. It exposes a real weakness of McCain’s. As Hilzoy notes:

Short version: during the last four years (all I checked), McCain has supported basic appropriations for vets. However, when there are two competing proposals, he generally chooses the cheaper one, and often, when only one proposal to increase benefits is available, he opposes it. But, as Beutler says, this doesn’t seem to be because he is in general in favor of fiscal discipline: in 2006, in particular, he voted against several bills that actually tried not just to increase spending on vets, but to pay for it, in one case voting for an identical bill that was not paid for.

If you think that we ought to be spending more money on veterans’ benefits and health care, it’s not a very good record.

Given John McCain’s public image, this line of attack can be very effective. McCain has an image as a veterans advocate, but his record is really not all that good.

1 Comment

Filed under Politics

Support the Troops?

The GOP loves to hammer Democrats over their refusals to “support the troops,” and everyone “knows” that Republicans love our troops and work hard to ensure that they are treated well when they return from Iraq and Afghanistan. Never mind Walter Reed, Fort Bragg, stop loss policies and the myriad other disgraces that have occurred on the GOP’s watch, they just love to support the troops. And of course John McCain is the leader of Republican pack when it comes to supporting the troops, right? So why is he refusing to sign on to Jim Webb’s bill to create a new GI Bill to send Iraq and Afghanistan veterans to college? The bill that has 56 co-sponsors in the Senate? Including numerous Republican co-sponsors like Norm Coleman, Susan Collins, Pete Domenici, Chuck Hagel, Dick Lugar, Lisa Murkowski, Gordon Smith, Olympia Snowe and John Warner? Why? Because he’s worried that letting veterans go to college would “negatively affect retention rates?” Is that supporting our troops?

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics